2013-01-30

Elite Depression at Davos

***Fund raising Status: We are now down to $95 needed to make our deficit this month.  This is the 30th with only one more day to go.  By the numerous responses we receive from all over the world, we know this endeavor to bring truth to humanity is making an impact and meeting our obligations will allow that to continue. 

Your donations make it possible for us to continue providing this information and making an even greater impact.  We wish to continue doing this service for humanity and this last bit that we need will ensure our continued journey toward that new, cooperative, compassionate, proposperous healthy world that we all want that benefits everyone regardless of soveriegnty, culture and language.  

In that sense, and in many other ways, we are all in this together.   Thank you for your support in so many meaningful ways, not only financially, but the great comments, links, leads to other rabbit holes, and otherwise.  God bless you all and keep you sacred and spiritual  for a peaceful and blessed life.
 
Vatic Note:  I find it interesting that this publication about these big guys in the biggest game in town, did not mention one word about the LIBOR scandel that cost many of them millions, if not billions of dollars.  But then maybe this publication is working for the Rothschilds, so they don't discuss what they don't want us to know.  Could be.  Or it could be a Rothschild game and the davos players know better than to question it, and just give up their millions and keep their mouths shut.  

Or why did they not talk about the coincidence that the fathers of two lone gun nuts, who, "supposedly" did mass murder in Aurora and Sandy Hook, were both supoenaed to testilie before a court on the Libor scandel that shafted their co-theives at an international level.  Not a safe thing to do. Is that just a coincidence???  What are the odds, huh?  I would love to have someone calculate those odds.  

Now, if they did talk about it, that would explain why they are depressed.  Someone speculated that they are too far into this game to stop it now.  But they know their butts are on the line here.  

If it goes sour as it probably will, since the incompetence has been impressive for these sociopaths... who are usually brilliant, then they may well find themselves behind bars for life or a death sentence. Must be all that organ harvesting those old coots do that has damaged their brains. (Kissinger, Rockefeller, Bush Sr who are all over 90 years old.) Or it could be the inbreeding.  Who knows these days with these totally insane psycho satanists. 

If we want to stop these people and the famines and other economic crisises they have planned and worked so hard to bring about, all we have to do is CHARGE THEM WITH A RICO CONSPIRACY, CONFISCATE THEIR TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, THROW THEIR BUTTS IN JAIL AND USE THE MONEY WE CONFISCATED TO CLEAN UP THE MESS THEY MADE OF OUR ECONOMY AND OUR COUNTRY. The next article shows what happens when you do that.  ICELAND DID THAT AND GUESS WHAT?  They are in recovery and that is what is depressing the Davos people.  That is all we have to do.   If necessary, we can do it ourselves and not rely on the justice system as we know, its fully corrupt as "FAST AND FURIOUS" showed us and how Congress let them get away with it.

Yes, it really is up to us.  We have met who will save us and unfortunately, its us! 

By Staff Report

Inertia reigns as elite return to Davos ... The theme of this year's WEF Davos meeting is "Resilient Dynamism" ... Some of the world's most influential leaders will be faced with a familiar set of unsolved problems during the World Economic Forum's (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, following a year of economic and political stagnation. 

Derided by some as being little more than a millionaire's cocktail party indulging in empty rhetoric, the 43rd gathering of international movers and shakers will again talk about debt crises, rampant unemployment, environmental time bombs and irresponsible finance. (VN:  Yes, I am sure they will. It will probably go something like this,  "Rothschild, you did not tell us that wreaking the American economy would result in us losing millions, how come? And he will respond.... "Sit down, and shut up, nobody asked you and they won't until you become a trillionaire like I am and then your opinion will matter."  Yup, pretty depressing I would say)

The lack of progress from last January even has WEF founder Klaus Schwab tearing his hair out while lamenting the tendency of many countries to look after their own interests at the expense of finding global solutions. "The fact is that we are still in some way blocked from making progress," he told a press conference on January 15. – SwissInfo

 Dominant Social Theme: We will solve the problems of the world! Again and again ...  (VN: you mean the ones that the International bankers continue to make every 70 or so years?  Then revolution on the top economic country, precipitated by their central bank, like it did to Russia and Germany, then a quickly created third world war with destruction that will  take another 70 years to rebuild using the bankers companies, so trillions again will flow into the Rothschild coffers and of course the Bilderbergs and royalty of Europe.  So what is new?)

Free-Market Analysis: Interesting to read about the mood at Davos, which is yet another confab of mostly lower elites and Hollywood "stars."

Lower elites go to such confabs to divine just what dominant social themes are in fashion at the moment. The idea is to promote those themes closest to the collective heart of Top Guns.

It's a get-together, then, of people who want to be noticed by the mega-trillionaires who control central banks and already run the world informally. The idea is that if you show your willingness to use your time and fortune to propagandize the world correctly, you'll be rewarded with increased business contacts, deals and, in the end, money.

Yes, it's all about the money. They are visiting Davos to figure out what lies are in fashion. They wish to become more proficient.

This year they are depressed! They are not depressed at the prospect of lying. They are only depressed because the lies are not being received as well by the rest of the world.

Here's some more from the article:

"The title of this year's WEF Davos meeting - "Resilient Dynamism" - is in itself a misnomer according to Greenpeace Switzerland, which will co-present the Public Eye Award to the "worst company of the year" in Davos once the WEF conference is in full swing.

The five most likely risks to the world, according to WEF's panel of experts:

"Severe income disparity
Chronic fiscal imbalances
Rising greenhouse gas emissions
Water supply crisis
Mismanagement of population ageing
Problems remain"

"Governments and the corporate world are showing great resilience against change but still little positive dynamism," Michael Baumgartner, head of corporate accountability at Greenpeace Switzerland, told swissinfo.ch.

"If corporations would simply stop creating some of the world's largest social and ecological problems the rest of us would not have to try to solve them. Solutions can only come via a bottom up approach, with people raising their voices."

Economically and politically, the world appeared to have stagnated in 2012. Despite the Arab Spring revolution that gripped the Davos conference two years ago, huge problems still exist in Libya, Egypt and particularly Syria.

The global economy inched forwards by 2.3 per cent last year, according to the World Bank, but the leaders of growth, principally China, slowed down. The European Union is still mired in debt and decision making conflict, while politicians in the United States continue to bicker as the country heads towards insolvency.

Financial scandals continued to proliferate among big banks, no less so in Switzerland than in any other part of the world ...

The underlying message was clear: the world's political and business leaders need to work together to solve problems rather than continue to act in their own interests.

We can see various elite memes that are likely to be in vogue this year – at least the top five. Notice how many are scarcity based. Yet there are NO fundamental scarcities on Earth, at least none that cannot be overcome by individual human action.

Those at Davos want us to believe that a famine can only be averted by a cohesive public/private effort that also involves the United Nations and a gaggle of NGOs. Von Mises's solution would be to plant a garden!  (VN:  Especially since any famine is man made by haarp and weather manipulation globally, along with the deadly chemicals dumped by Evergreen Airways on contract with the bankers. They should all be thrown in jail for these crimes they are committing with absolutely no intentions of stopping it.  WE need to globalize them all into the nearest prison. )

Individual human action is always preferable to large bureaucratic ones, and cheaper, too.

But such pro-offered insights will be mercifully in short supply at Davos thanks to what we call the Internet Reformation. As more and more elite promotions are seen as fantastical propaganda aimed at reinforcing globalism rather than addressing real issues, the elites purveying these memes will find less and less receptivity.
This is an ongoing trend. The REAL frustration at Davos is not that people are refusing to "take action" according to elite proscriptions such as those at Davos but that people are beginning to discount them altogether. Internet debunking continues to make progress.
For an additional source of free-market analysis of news like what's coming out of Davos, see this Daily Bell Special Report: "The Best Free-Market Economics and Pro-Liberty Educational Resource on the 'Net and Why I Use It Religiouly."
Conclusion: Here's a question they ought to be contemplating at Davos. How do you hold a "crisis society" together when people don't believe in the crises anymore?
By:
Date:

[Vatic: Paste your article on top of this paragraph. Title needs to be in the field above; repeating the "Title" inside the post is optional but useful. Date is useful particularly when it differs significantly from posting date. If you are posting only your own words and not reproducing someone else's article, then all of the above and below are optional. If you are only posting excerpts from an article to condense it, insert on lines by themselves three dots (...) to indicate where you cut out passages.]

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: