FOOD CO, DRUG COMPANIES, HOMELAND SECURITY etc etc..... NO war Mr. President, Timothy "ECONOMIC HITMAN FOR IMF" Geithner, and Bill, Khazar Zionist owned and controlled, Gates. If we go to war it will be each nations people against their khazar international satanic bankers and their operatives and NO ONE ELSE EVER. NON COOPERATION IN YOUR STUPID GREEDY MONEY MAKING WARS... FORGET IT. ITS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. No one will fight and die for you nor give up their wealth for you, CAN YOU HEAR ME? etc...... SEND YOUR OWN KIDS AND FAMILY TO DIE FOR GREED AND PROFIT, and see how YOU like it. You do that and maybe we might reconsider, but I doubt it. Its a chance you take.
NOTICE TO CHINA, ALL MONIES BORROWED FROM YOU WERE BY FRAUD PERPETRATED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST BANKERS, I SUGGEST YOU GO AFTER THEM AND NO ONE WILL STOP YOU. THEY HAVE ALL YOUR MONEY. Our SOS is a khazar operative as is our DOD person, they do not work for us nor does HLS and all three have proven that time and again and we can prove it. WE DO NOT WANT WAR WITH YOU. WE WILL NOT FIGHT IN WARS WITH YOU UNLESS YOU TRY TO OCCUPY OUR SOIL, THEN YOU WORK FOR THEM AND THUS ARE OUR ENEMY. Many Americans published notices to all lenders who lent money to the Rothschild international IMF/Fed Res private banking system, that we were not responsible for their debts and the private Rothschild lenders were to be held responsible personally and individually, so please collect from those who borrowed from you, Bernanke, Greenspan, Goldman Sachs, IMF, World bank. THEY HAVE RECORD PROFITS AND $12 TRILLION OF OUR WEALTH FOR YOU TO COLLECT. Good luck. You war is with the Rothschilds who will do you in as soon as they are done using you. That is their pattern and their history. Think about it. We have a deep respect for your peoples' intellect and insight into enemies of your past and these people are YOUR enemy, NOT US, we were there for you during WW II against the Japanese, and we have welcomed Chinese people here in this country with open arms and have a great relationship with them. The bankers want control of your wealth like they did ours, its not our gov doing this except for key people outlined above. The rest have been blackmailed, killed or threatened. They have gutted this nation and thus we as a people, we are no threat to you. Let us be and we will do the same. If you are nuked or attacked in anyway, the way to stop it is to nuke the residence of the Head Rothschild in France, Paris to be exact who lives on the same street as the palace. Aim well, please.
Prepping Minds for War Against China
By Shamus Cooke, provided to Vatic Project by Elizabeth Allen, USA
URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22820
Global Research, January 17, 2011
But selling wars takes time. The average American hasn't bought into this false advertising yet. So the big lie will be repeated until its roots are deeply sunk into the American psyche: China, says the U.S. government, is a threat that needs to be "dealt with.”
This propaganda assault is multi-faceted, taking aim from all directions. Any China-related issue -- military, economic, and social -- is open for attack. For example, the head of the U.S. Department of Defense, Robert Gates, recently visited Asia and focused much of his trip talking about China as a "military threat.” What is this threat? Gates answers that China has shown a "rapid buildup of military capability,” proven by its production of a "stealth fighter.” The U.S. media had a field day with this news, intending to sow terror in the psyche of the American public. A quick glance at the numbers reveals that Mr. Gates and the unquestioning U.S. media are unabashed hypocrites: China is nowhere near the U.S. when it comes to military expenditures: the U.S., under Obama, will spend $725 billion in 2011(!), while China will spend $80 billion.
When it comes to overseas military bases, China has zero; the U.S. has at least 737! While Gates was traveling throughout Asia on his Chinese provocation tour, Hillary Clinton joined the attack, targeting China's human rights record in a lengthy, inflammatory speech, which included this slight: "... when China lives up to its obligations of respecting and protecting universal human rights, it will not only benefit more than one billion people, it will also benefit the long-term peace, stability and prosperity of China."
Yes, China is a violator of human rights, but in voicing her criticism Mrs. Clinton managed to raise the bar of hypocrisy to new heights.
Has Clinton forgotten that Guantanamo Bay remains open, filled with tortured people who are charged with no crimes? Has she forgotten that Bagram Air base in Afghanistan continues to deny the International Red Cross access to its "black site" detention center, since they would discover the torture chambers described by ex-detainees? Need we mention Bradley Manning, who remains in solitary confinement without any criminal charges, for allegedly informing the American public about U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan and all kinds of secret machinations?
But before Clinton's speech became yesterday’s news, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner provided anti-China reinforcements, this time blasting China's economy. The Washington Post reports:
"China's unwillingness to allow its currency to rise in value is hampering U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace and harming the Chinese economy, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said Wednesday... " (January 12, 2011).
Once again, utter hypocrisy. No single government has caused more damage to the global economy than the United States, whose corporations sparked the global downturn by saturating the world with trillions of dollars in fraudulent housing mortgages sold as top-rated investments.
This policy was encouraged by the U.S. government, which gave the corporations cheap money with little oversight, a strategy that continues to this day with the Federal Reserve printing dollars non-stop that U.S. corporations are using to speculate on foreign currencies and drive the prices up of oil and other raw materials worldwide.
The above-mentioned Obama administration officials have no problem peddling their anti-China bias to the U.S. media, which stumble over themselves to provide assistance whenever possible. The New York Times recently published an editorial entitled, The Real Problem With China:
"For the United States, the No.1 problem with China’s economy is probably intellectual property theft.” (January 12, 2011).
In reality, the real problem that the U.S. government has with China is two-fold: China's growth is pushing aside U.S. influence/power all over the world, which has negative influence on the profits of U.S. corporations, which are losing contracts to Chinese companies.
In response, the U.S. is provoking China in the media and militarily, encircling China by arming U.S. allies in the region, especially India, Japan and South Korea. Hillary Clinton responded to this allegation by denying it, while the Obama administration immediately contradicted her by its actions. The New York Times published an article addressing the issue while failing to connect the dots:
"The United States is not bent on containing China, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday, but the Obama administration is cultivating other allies across Asia to help it manage Beijing’s increasingly bold projection of military and economic power." (January 12, 2011).
This policy of encirclement and provocation can easily lead to war. As Obama continues to tighten the noose while China struggles to squirm its neck free, the odds grow that military "incidents" may happen, especially as the U.S. throws additional military force in waters just off China's coast in the South China Sea.
The Obama administration joins the right wing in trying to blame both the recession and the startling U.S. inequality in wealth on China. The real culprits are the corporate friendly politicians in the Democratic and Republican parties, which have both spent decades cutting taxes for the rich and corporations, while encouraging the wealthy to flee the U.S. and its living wage jobs for the third world, where slave wages equal larger profits.
The best way for working people to deal with this situation is to ignore the anti-China hype and focus their fire on the U.S. government and U.S. corporations. Demanding jobs from the government NOW that are paid for by taxing the rich is the best way to overcome the economic problems of the U.S. Working people cannot be distracted by fake overseas threats, whether they are alleged terrorists or foreign governments. The real threat continues to be closer to home.
Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action. He can be reached at shamuscook@gmail.com
China and Intellectual Property Theft - NYTimes.com Please support Global Research
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/business/economy/12leonhardt.html?_r=1&hp
U.S. Is Not Trying to Contain China, Clinton Says
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/15/world/asia/15diplo.html?_r=1&hp
Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.
Your endorsement is greatly appreciated
Subscribe to the Global Research e-newsletter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
To become a Member of Global Research
The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com
© Copyright Shamus Cooke, Global Research, 2011
The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22820
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
2 comments:
Keep your eye on the Grand Chessboard Each piece, regardless of where is sits on the board, is working with the other pieces.
There's the overwhelming evidence that Obama is following the encirclement strategy outlined by Zbig, his chief foreign policy adviser.
On the other hand, China is the world's largest holder of American dollars and debt.
For the encirclement strategy to continue, America's debt to China has to be repudiated; but if it happened outright, America's credit throughout the whole world would collapse.
The "solution"--obviously planned years in advance--is to deliberately crash the dollar, threatening the whole world's economy; whereupon, the dollar would be dumped in favor of a world currency controlled by the world bankers.
A bigger crisis than we've seen so far would have to take place to get the rest of the world to sign on to the scheme.
While those are great points, could you relook at them with this variable we had not considered?
Assume that the head of China and his minions are all part of the global plan under the Rothschilds/Rockefellers. Assume that the president of China attended Oxford like his contemporaries globally or some other secret society school. He was trained and educated by these same villians who are raping and pillaging gthe globe as we speak. Let me know if that would make a difference in your assessment.
He could well be capable of selling out his own country. Look at us here, two presidents from different parties have done it, if not more.
Post a Comment